Emerging Ethical AI Governance in Southeast Asia through Global and Regional Frameworks
Keywords:
Ethical AI Governance, ASEAN, Artificial Intelligence, Global Governance, Norm Diffussion, Southeast AsiaAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has generated increasing governance and ethical concerns worldwide, including issues related to transparency, accountability, fairness, privacy, and human rights. In response, international organizations and governments have developed frameworks intended to promote responsible and ethical AI development. Within Southeast Asia, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) introduced the ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics in 2024 as a regional framework to support ethical AI governance and policy coordination among member states. This study examines how global AI governance principles are translated into ASEAN’s regional framework and adapted within national AI governance strategies in Singapore, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand. Using qualitative documentary analysis and a comparative case study approach, the study analyzes international, regional, and national AI governance frameworks through the lenses of global governance and norm diffusion. The findings indicate that ASEAN has emerged as an important platform for promoting ethical AI principles and regional policy coordination through a soft-governance approach. However, substantial variation exists in governance readiness, institutional capacity, and implementation across member states. While Singapore demonstrates a relatively advanced AI governance framework, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand remain at different stages of policy development and implementation. The study further finds that global AI governance principles originating from frameworks such as UNESCO and the OECD are transmitted through ASEAN’s regional framework and selectively adapted within national governance systems. Although ASEAN provides a common ethical foundation, its voluntary and non-binding nature limits its ability to ensure consistent implementation across the region. Strengthening regional coordination, institutional capacity, and implementation mechanisms will therefore be essential for advancing ethical AI governance in Southeast Asia.
Downloads
References
Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. Routledge.
Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239-275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024
ASEAN Secretariat. (2024). ASEAN guide on AI governance and ethics. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ASEAN-Guide-on-AI-Governance-and-Ethics_beautified_201223_v2.pdf
Bostrom, N., Dafoe, A., & Flynn, C. (2018). Public policy and superintelligent AI: A vector field approach. Future of Humanity Institute.
Dafoe, A. (2018). AI governance: A research agenda. Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford.
European Parliament. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union.
G20 New Delhi Summit Information Centre. (2023). G20 compliance report: Artificial intelligence—2023 New Delhi Summit. University of Toronto. https://www.g20.utoronto.ca/compliance/2023newdelhi-final/07-2023-g20-compliance-final-AI.pdf
G7. (2023). G7 leaders' statement on the Hiroshima AI process. https://g7g20-documents.org/database/document/2023-g7-japan-leaders-leaders-language-g7-leaders-statement-on-the-hiroshima-ai-process
Fathom, L. M. (2023). Prospects for digitalization of ASEAN Smart Cities Network securitization: Case studies Indonesia. WIMAYA: Interdisciplinary Journal of International Affairs, 4(1), 1–12.
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
Fong, K. (2026). What is shaping artificial intelligence governance policies in Southeast Asia? ISEAS Perspective. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ISEAS-Perspective_2026_13.pdf
Htoo, Z. (2025). Beyond the matrix: AI governance gaps in Southeast Asia. CSIS Jakarta.
IMDA & PDPC. (2020). Model AI governance framework (2nd ed.). Infocomm Media Development Authority and Personal Data Protection Commission. https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/-/media/Files/PDPC/PDF-Files/Resource-for-Organisation/AI/SGModelAIGovFramework2.pdf
Kivimäki, T. (2001). The long peace of ASEAN. Journal of Peace Research, 38(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343301038001001
OECD. (2024). OECD AI principles. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles
Pertama Partners. (2026). ASEAN AI Governance & Ethics Guide: Business Implications. Policy Insight Report.
Schmitt, L. (2021). Mapping global AI governance: A nascent regime in a fragmented landscape. https://www.globe-project.eu/en/mapping-global-ai-governance-a-nascent-regime-in-a-fragmented-landscape_14101
Smart Nation Singapore. (2023). National artificial intelligence strategy 2.0 (NAIS 2.0). Singapore Government. https://www.smartnation.gov.sg/nais/
UNESCO. (2022). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
US-ASEAN Business Council. (2023). AI governance in Southeast Asia https://www.usasean.org/sites/default/files/2023-10/%5BUS-ASEAN%5D%20AI%20Governance%20in%20Southeast%20Asia.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Numtip Smerchuar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
