Bordering Beyond Borders: A Governmentality Analysis of Australia’s Operation Sovereign Borders and Israel’s Externalisation of Asylum Policy
Keywords:
Governmentality, Operation Sovereign Borders, Externalisation, Asylum Seekers, Deterrence, Australia, IsraelAbstract
This paper analyses how Australia and Israel transform deterrence into an ethical means of moral control; it investigates how these nations are using the concept of "care" in order to rationalise their strict border management practices. Through its analysis of Australia's Operation Sovereign Borders and Israel's externalisation policies, this paper demonstrates how the act of coercion can be disguised as compassionate action, and exclusionary actions are portrayed as protective actions. This paper utilises the theoretical framework of Foucauldian governmentality to illustrate how the Australian and Israeli governments utilise moral reasoning to govern asylum seekers; they merge authority with empathy, and both appear to be one and the same. Furthermore, this paper illustrates that while deterrence may work through physical force, it also works by the notion that controlling movement is an ethically responsible obligation. Both instances demonstrate how morality is used as a mechanism of power and how humanitarian language serves as an exclusionary device. Thus, by demonstrating how such practices occur, this paper aids in explaining how the discourse of care has become a core aspect of the global governance of mobility.
Downloads
References
Amitay, G. (2023). Criminalization of Asylum Seekers in Israel: Toward an Agentic Research Perspective that Opposes Othering and Estrangement. Critical Criminology, 31(2), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-022-09681-6
Ann Martin, C. (2025). Protecting National Sovereignty: The ‘Australian Model’ and the Exclusion of Asylum Seekers. Sociology, 59(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385241258954
Aris, S. (2021). International vs. Area? The Disciplinary-Politics of Knowledge-Exchange Between IR and Area Studies. International Theory, 13(3), 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000184
Bianko, A. B., & Bromberg, T. (2022). Detention of Migrants and Asylum Seekers in Israel: Annual Monitoring Report 2021.
Bigo, D. (2002). Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives, 27(Special Issue), 63–92.
Birger, L., Shoham, S., & Bolzman, L. (2018). ‘Better a Prison in Israel than Dying on the Way’: Testimonies of Refugees Who ‘Voluntarily’ Departed Israel to Rwanda and Uganda and Gained Protection in Europe.
Brown, G. (2016). No Advantage? Lessons from Australia’s Experiments in Asylum Policy. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 17(1), 20–27.
Castel, R. (1991). From Dangerousness to Risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality: With Two Lecturers by and an Interview with Michel Foucault (pp. 281–198). The University of Chicago Press.
Fassin, D. (2011). Policing Borders, Producing Boundaries. The Governmentality of Immigration in Dark Times. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 213–226.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality: With Two Lecturers by and an Interview with Michel Foucault (pp. 87–104). The University of Chicago Press.
Fraser, G. (2020). Foucault, Governmentality Theory and “Neoliberal Community Development.” Community Development Journal, 55(3), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsy049
Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental Rationality: An Introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality: With Two Lecturers by and an Interview with Michel Foucault (pp. 1–52). The University of Chicago Press.
Ibekwe, S. O. (2022). ‘Preventing People from Risking Their Lives at Sea’: Forced Migration and the Securitization of Asylum Seekers in Australia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(3), 625–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911211032514
Kampmark, B. (2017). Securitization, Refugees, and Australia’s Turn Back the Boats Policy, 2013-2015. Antipodes, 31(1), 61–75.
Lemke, T. (2002). Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/089356902101242288
Missbach, A., & Palmer, W. (2019). Deterring Asylum Seeking in Australia: Bribing Indonesian Smugglers to Return Asylum Seekers to Indonesia. Court of Conscience, 13, 77–82.
Pronk, A. (2024). The Price of Deterrence: Australia’s Path to Maintaining Sovereign Borders.
Sarkin, J. J., & Morais, T. (2024). Assessing the Intersectional Impact of Domestic Migration Law: Reacting to State-Created Categories and Vulnerabilities of Asylum Seekers in Israel. Israel Law Review, 57(3), 423–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223724000128
van Berlo, P. (2015). Australia’s Operation Sovereign Borders: Discourse, Power, and Policy from a Crimmigration Perspective. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 34(4), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdv011
Van Kooy, J., Magee, L., & Robertson, S. (2021). “Boat People” and Discursive Bordering: Australian Parliamentary Discourses on Asylum Seekers, 1977-2013. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 37(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40661
Yaron, H., Hashimshony-Yaffe, N., & Campbell, J. (2013). ‘Infiltrators’ or Refugees? An Analysis of Israel’s Policy Towards African Asylum Seekers. International Migration, 51(4), 144–157.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Titan Alramadhan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
